AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Propaganda Wishful Thinking Rar File4/25/2021
My softball teams disapproval (they think I should go for the higher salary) should be irrelevant.
Propaganda Wishful Thinking Rar File Full Of ConflictingIf you did not sort the credible from the incredible, the serious from the playful, the essential from the nonessential, the world would be full of conflicting and bewildering messages.![]() It is aimed at forming opinions rather than increasing knowledge. Propaganda intends to persuade without offering a logical reason to adopt a particular view or take a particular action. While the word itself carries rather a negative connotation (implying intent to mislead or deceive) the techniques can be used in good causes as wella Cancer Society fundraiser, for example. At least some propaganda techniques are used occasionally by non-profit organizations, advertisers, churches, news organizations, governments, and instructors. Because some propaganda uses facts (albeit selectively), it can look like a reasoned argument. But because it fails to make a logical case, propaganda is often fallacious as well as emotional. For example, in a discussion of the pros and cons of privatizing Social Security, it would be an ad hominem attack simply to declare your opponent a parasite feeding on the lifeblood of the working class. Similarly, you would be guilty of an ad hominem attack if you exclaimed, How can you claim to be a born-again Christian (pointing out an inconsistency of position) or Of course you would say thatyoure a Libertarian (pointing out personal bias). None of these response addresses the actual pros and cons of the proposal to privatize Social Security. Ad nauseum repetition is the stuff urban legends are made of. Less harmless than urban legends is the indoctrination (brainwashing) of cult groups, which aims to create belief by aiming sheer, ad nauseum repetition relentlessly at an exhausted subject. Educators fear that vouchers will undermine funding for public schools. Educators in particular might be inclined to conclude that this fear is universal among educators, and identify with the belief because they identify with the group. Now, specialists agreeing on objective claims about matters within their field of expertise are reasonably to be believed, but specialists making value judgments outside their field might not. For more, see the TIP Sheet Objective and Subjective Claims.). Certainly anger is sometimes justified, when it follows an argument that gives me grounds for anger, but anger is not the way to reach that conclusion. Anger short-circuits the reasoning process, whereby we might have examined the figures and learned (much to our surprise) that education funding is up from last yearjust not up as much as originally hoped. Whether this student is qualified to pass the class depends on the quality and quantity of work completed, not on financial need. There is no relevant connection between the students need on the one hand, and the quality of work she has (or has not) performed on the other. While there is nothing wrong with belonging to a group, some decisions are not group decisions, should be made without taking a head count, and should be held to even if they are unpopular. For example, my softball teams consensus should probably not be the determining factor in my decision to take a cut in pay in return for more flexibility in my working hours.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |